The Journal of Sharia Fundamentals for Specialized Researches

About the Journal :

The Journal of Sharia Fundamentals for Specialized Researches is published quarterly, it is designed for whoever researcher seeking welfare that is based on knowledge. It seeks to provide a platform for the excellent researchers to present and consider the values and themes of various religious and social sciences acquired by learning and practice. It aimed at becoming a meeting point and channel for researchers to publish their innovative works, with regard to the interpretation of Islamic Sharia sciences and its regulations and the enhancing of social sciences to become adequate programs that serve the human and society in a significant and neutral way.

Our mission is to maintain the efforts of researchers and their innovative works in Islamic Sharia sciences known for its human civilizational value, through which we can spread awareness among people and ensure respect and strength of Islamic identity in different scientific, cultural, and social environments.

Therefore, this journal is designed to serve as a platform to identify the various religious and social dimensions of knowledge, such as considering the Holy Quran as the foremost and fundamental source of Islamic rules followed by the Sunah (biography of the Prophet Mohammed Peace and Blessings be Upon Him) that explains and clarifies the Holy Quran, along with its affiliated Sharia studies on the individual and society, such as studies concerned with Ijtihad which focuses on the studying of modern issues and finding solutions to them.


Different narrations of Hadith are categorized into two groups according to its influence on jurisprudential judgment: disagreement of variance and disagreement of contradiction. Contradiction and disagreement found in some narrations of Hadith are considered part of what is known in Hadith methodology as Mukhtalif Al-Hadith and Mushkil Al-Hadith, which discusses particularly contradictions in a Hadith. Such branch of Hadith has great impact on jurisprudential judgment. Some Hadith scholars call it disagreement of contrariness which seems more appropriate for the Hadith narrations that its disagreement was by no means eliminated or explained. Such cases are rare and some scholars had denied it and considered its disagreement as simple and obvious that it can be explained and directed. And indeed, this is the bottom line of disagreement among Hadith narrations as sound Hadiths may never contradict without giving accurate explanations to reconcile among contradicted narrations.